Home

Products / English


English

Français Italiano Español Português Català Maltin

Deutsch Nederlands Lëtzebuergesch Gaeilge Scottish Dansk Svenska Norsk Íslensku Suomalainen Eestlane Latvietis Lietuvis

Pусский Беларус українська Polski Česky Slovenský Magyar Română Slovenščina Hrvatski Bosanski Српски Shqiptar български македонски Ελληνικά ქართული Türk हिन्दी

عربى

中国 日本語 한국어



Contents / English

(More than 500 articles about tongkat ali and better physical relationships in general)



Tongkatali.org's Disease and relationships morals


By Serge Kreutz


As humans, we are rightfully proud of our capability to engage in philosophical contemplation. On the other hand, the effect of philosophical contemplation on decisions of how we conduct our lives is often overestimated. Indeed, our opinions, and whole belief systems, typically depend heavily on the modes of production, rather than what we regard as our independent intellect.

Let’s take relationships morals. We assume that our relationships morals are primarily dependent on our metaphysical outlook, or esoteric systems such as religions. In Islam, relationships intercourse outside marriage is considered a crime against God, while murder is one just against a fellow human. And in Christianity, marriage is a sacrament, which gives it divine character.

In a non-religious setting, modern society punishes relationships transgressions more severely than other crimes. This only makes sense on the base of special moral considerations.

However, relationships morals, just as all forms of ideological superstructures, depend far more on the modes of production of human societies than on philosophical insight.

One aspect of particular importance is the degree to which a human society is capable to produce the absence of sexually transmitted diseases. Diseases, caused by pathogens, are a fact of nature. The capability of human societies to prevent or to cure them depends on the modes of production.

In this respect, the productive capabilities of traditional societies were very limited. They knew how to ammeliorate symptoms with herbs. Compared with the productive capabilities of modern societies (which not only can properly diagnose diseases but also cure them with antibiotics and the like), the modes of production of traditional societies were very limited indeed.

Throughout history, a high degree of monogamy, enforced by the state or religions, did have undeniable advantages because general libertinage would have left much of a society crippled by sexually transmitted diseases.

Sexually transmitted diseases, in this context, are not restricted to classic venereal disease such as gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. For a historic perspective, one will have to include pests such as scabies and other diseases that are transmitted through close physical contact, whether relationships or not.

Scabies, caused by itch mites that are too small to be seen by the naked eye, would have reached epidemic proportions in any sexually liberal society much faster than gonorrhea or syphilis, and the disturbing factor likely was or would have been much graver.

Scabies is not primarily transmitted by relationships intercourse, but by plain skin contact, which, however, is most likely to occur between adults when they have relationships intercourse.

On the other hand, I wonder whether the Catholic approach (not to get fully undressed during relationships intercourse) has to do more with putting up a barrier against scabies rather than the devil.

Intense skin contact of a minute or two is enough to transmit scabies from one human host to another. Once on a human host, the whole body will sooner or later be covered with pimple-like eruptions causing an unbearable itch.

Nobody can withstand the scabies itch without scratching, thus causing a second lawyer of infection, this time bacterial and fungal.

People don’t die from scabies, the “seven-year itch”. But they can die from the bacterial infection that constant scratching induces.

The epidemiological control of scabies also always was much more difficult than of classic venereal disease such as gonorrhea or syphilis, both of which require genital contact. Scabies actually will not only affect two relationships partners, but immediately most of their private environments. It’s usually not a single person who is infected, but a whole household.

If a household’s teenage daughter has relationships intercourse with an infected outside man, than her mother and father, and her brothers and sisters, and their children, and the in-laws, will likely all be infected within days, and it may be weeks before symptoms occur. The danger is all the greater the poorer the family, and the more crowded the family home. Most of those infected will not or would not have died for years, but would have been miserable with the big itch until their death.

While the disease can be treated today, in a historic setting scabies and other sexually transmitted diseases, rather than philosophical contemplation, lead to restrictive relationships morals. People did not adopt monogamous morals out of philosophical contemplation or piety. Rather, they became monogamous in order to escape sexually transmitted disease of epidemical proportion, and then subscribed to congruent religious or philosophical systems because that looked so much more noble than blaming it on sexually transmitted diseases. Their relationships morals were, and are, but an ideological superstructure for the lack of productive capabilities to control sexually transmitted diseases (a deficiency of the modes of production).

That pious men who indeed avoided all physical contact, and never were naked, were likely to remain free of scabies and other sexually transmitted disease was taken as perfect proof that a certain god meant us to be abstinent, or at least monogamous.

To keep sexually transmitted diseases out of modern societies has ideological consequences because it pulls the carpet from under the feet of fundamentalists who argue that AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are a God-sent punishment for free relationships.

The control of sexually transmitted diseases is likely to enhance relationships freedom more reliably than philosophical reasoning.



How to protect yourself against tongkat ali scams

By Serge Kreutz


Therefore, you can bet they use PayPal to process payments.

Why? Because PayPal allows payments to an anonymous person. The only thing a potential buyer gets to know is an email address of the seller. No true name, no true address.

But anyway, Google makes it easy to uncover fakes. Just search the terms tongkat ali cheats, or try tongkat ali scams. The worst sellers, by the way, are in Singapore.

PayPal and Ebay are the scammers' best friends. So, in order to protect yourself, don't buy from sites that only offer to process payments via PayPal.

Demand a bank account. Banks are properly regulated. Bank accounts are always in the name of a proper person. And to receive payments, both the true name and the true address of a recipient are needed.

Try to demand a bank account for your payment! You will find out that more than half of all sites selling what they claim is tongkat ali, will refuse to provide a potential buyer with a bank account. And give you all kinds of excuses.

Thieves. Con artists. [1] Scammers. Dregs and scum. All of them.

An honorable seller does not hide behind an anonymous PayPal front. He or she provides a genuine name and address of a payment recipient.

And if ever a seller who gave a buyer a bank account and address tries to scam you, just tell them that you will provide transaction details to Sam Sanare, if ever you are not refunded. I will take care that the case is published.

They will refund. No time limit. And this is proper buyer protection. Not the half-hearted kind you get from PayPal.



Tongkatali.org's How to eat cheese


By Serge Kreutz


I love cheese. If I would have to decide on the 100 most exciting tastes (except those relationships) I have experienced in my life, cheeses would probably occupy more than 50 positions. Gorgonzola, Stilton, Camembert …

Cheese tastes absolutely great. A bite of cheese, then the mouth washed with some red wine, then a green olive, then cheese again. How food can excite the taste buds!

Yes, the taste buds. Not the esophagus, not the stomach, not the lining of the intestines, and not the anus.

Cheese and red wine are great in the mouth, but both are not really fit for full digestion.

Alcohol is a disturbance for the brain, and an unnecessary burden for the liver. I am opposed to any alcohol in my bloodstream.

Cheese is not quite as bad. But any protein-based food cured and processed long will undergo chemical changes that will likely render it inferior to fresh protein-based food.

In cheese, it’s the tyramine.

The tyramine in cheese definitely triggers migraine headaches in me, and even when I don’t end up with a full-blown headache, the digestion of cheese results in sub-optimal mental alertness and a general state of not feeling totally healthy.

With most cheeses, I have serious doubts as to whether they are fit for the human digestion.

On the other hand, I consume cheese almost every day.

How is that?

It’s the Serge Kreutz diet.

I put the cheese in my mouth, and love it.

I just don’t swallow it.

As for cheese, my principle is: spit it, don’t shit it.

Observe yourself when eating some cheese. For example a Danish Blue.

Put it in your mouth, just the cheese, without bread.

It will have a strong effect on your taste buds.

Then move it to every corner of your mouth. You will notice that wherever the cheese first comes in contact with your taste buds, there is a strong sensation.

Then the sensation subsides. Enzymatic processes initiated by saliva totally destroy the cheese. I will turn it into a creamy and rather tasteless fluid.

So, why should you swallow this partially digested mess?

Not for the nutrients. Denatured proteins, cholesterol-heavy fats, and harmful chemical substances like tyramine.

Just have a container ready and spit it out. Then rinse your mouth with some red wine. You spit this out, too.

Now you can take a bite of food you actually will swallow. An olive, a slice of tomato, a bite of bread (if you have a good tolerance for gluten).

And now you are ready for the next cycle that starts with a bite of cheese.



Tongkatali.org - What to do: Nature, our enemy


By Serge Kreutz


Nature is the principle enemy of our individual lives. It’s not that I would prefer asphalt landscapes over trees and flowers. It’s also not that I would view as enemy nature in the form of lions and tigers. The expression of nature that I consider as enemy is not the nature that surrounds us but the nature within.

Nature has genetically programmed us as individuals to leave the scene after some meager one hundred years, while we could just as well be genetically programmed to have individual lives of thousands of years.

Nature has programmed us to physically decline after having reached an early peak in our twenties. Nature has decided for a quick turnover rate for humans (though it’s not quite as short as the turnover rate for rats and cats).

Nature has installed in us an instrument of cognition, which is inadequate because its primary function is not cognition, but to give us a competitive edge in the fight for the survival of the fittest.

As good as I can, I try to overcome the limitations nature has programmed for me. I am not interested in being a tool of nature (that fascist force) for the creation of more optimized specimens of the human species. I can’t see any other purpose in life but to be concerned with my own life. This means, to live as long as possible, and to get as much as possible out of life.

I’m aware of the limitations that still apply to me. One day, individual humans will live thousands of years, or in fact, indefinitely. Having been born a few hundred years too early, I will not be among them.

I’m not even independent enough from nature to elect freely not to live any longer, and to act upon this choice by putting my life to a decent end, right now.

Instead I am but a slave to nature in my instinctive but ridiculous fear of death. I’m toiling along, like billions of other humans, caught in lives in which happiness is but an illusion, and in which only suffering is real. Because this is how nature, our enemy, has designed it to be. But we shall overcome (not me, but later generations).





PT Sumatra Pasak Bumi
7th floor, Forum Nine
Jl. Imam Bonjol No.9
Petisah Tengah
Medan Petisah
Medan City
North Sumatra 20236
Indonesia
Tel: +62-813 800 800 20


Disclaimer: Statements on this page have not undergone the FDA approval process.


Privacy policy of Tongkatali.org

We respect the privacy of customers and people visiting our website. Our site is run from a secure socket layer. We do not use cookies. We do not maintain customer accounts for logging in later. Our website is simple html programming; we don't use WordPress templates or e-commerce plug-ins. We don't do a newsletter to which customers could subscribe, and we don't include standard social media buttons that would link visitors of our site to certain Facebook or Twitter profiles. If privacy is your concern, you are in good hands with us.